Given that this "paradox" is just as subject to bivalent parsing as any other proposition, as 65.114.23.4 implies above, this "paradox" is really only a paradox for those who reject the principle of bivalence because the strict definition of an omnipotent being is illogical under that principle. The paradox sets out a task that only an omnipotent being could fail! University of North Carolina at Greensboro. The paradox provides examples of two outcomes, both of which leave god with limited powers, and therefore not omnipotent. On the other hand, if God cannot create a rock that is so heavy that he can’t lift it, God is not omnipotent. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties.Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. The Omnipotence Paradox: Inapplicable to Christianity? Joshua Hoffman received his Ph. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. The omnipotence paradox provides arguments to dispute both the existence of an omnipotent god as well as the existence of omnipotence itself. wordpress.com. Here’s what I think best answers the Omnipotence Paradox, and I’ll throw it here sense no one else seems to have brought it up: A rock that an omnipotent being can not lift is an illogical impossibility. The Omnipotence Paradox. The most popular example is the paradox of the stone. The omnipotence paradox is a family of paradoxes that arise with some understandings of the term omnipotent.The paradox arises, for example, if one assumes that an omnipotent being has no limits and is capable of realizing any outcome, even logically contradictory ideas such as creating square circles. The most famous example of omnipotence paradoxes is the “paradox of the stone.” The Omnipotence Paradox. One could say it is a unique characteristic of non-omnipotent beings that there are things they are unable to do. One such class of paradoxes are the â omnipotence paradoxes.â These have been used to argue omnipotence is logically impossible and that God, if there is God, cannot be omnipotent. The paradox in question: “Can an Omnipotent Being create a stone so heavy that it cannot lift it?” But that is easily solvable First, there are only two options here, he can make a stone heavy or not- he can not do both BECAUSE IT IS LOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, BEING OMNIPOTENT IS BEING ALL-POWERFUL IN REGARDS TO BEING POSSIBLE AND LOGICALLY COHERENT also The connotation of the argument, however, seems to be that there is no God at all. D. from Brown University. Joshua Hoffman received his Ph. Image via Quora. reddit.com. The paradox states that if â ¦ University of North Carolina at Greensboro. D. from Brown University. This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. D. from Brandeis University and Gary Rosenkrantz received his Ph. Hence, this being cannot perform all … Could an omnipotent being with infinite power create a stone so heavy that he is unable to lift it? What is Omnipotence Paradox Different versions of Omnipotence Paradox. The idea behind the question is to show that if God can create a rock so heavy that he cannot lift it, he is not omnipotent. One such class of paradoxes are the “omnipotence paradoxes.” These have been used to argue omnipotence is logically impossible and that God, if there is God, cannot be omnipotent. You remember in Part 6 I presented omnipotence paradox which states that If an omnipotent being is able to perform any action then it should be able to create a task that it is unable to perform.