It staggered about 35 yards and fell over dead. Re: Hornady Interbond vs Nosler Accubond Post by lo.johansson » 29 Aug 2009, 07:54 Har provatt hornaday-Interbond i 300 Weatherby 180.gr och den funkar fint i 1000,ms kommer att använda denna till höstens älgjakt för att testa annars går jag på min favoritkula Swift-scirocco 2 mvh/Lo I looked at the two bullets cut in half it appears the Hornady is thicker walled than the Nosler. NRA Life Member, GCO Member, GSSF Member, NRA Certified Rifle Instructor and, oddly enough, Member Revolutionary War Veterans Association (I look a lot younger). That being said, I have no experience with the accubond but they are built on the same principal as the interbond so they should perform accordingly. Thanx a million. The doe weighed about 80#. Votes: 6 17.1% Total voters 35; Aug 31, 2009. 30 Cal .308 165 gr InterBond® Item #30459 | 100/Box . Re: Hornady Interbond vs. Nosler Accubond... - 08/23/08 My Remington 7600 .308 Win with an 18.5 inch barrel will group the Interbonds into 1.5 inches (3 shots) pretty consistently at 100 yards. I did the same thing with the Hornady Interbond. Accubond shoots well out of my Model 700 (.30-06). Re: Barnes TTSX vs Nosler Accubond I like Accubonds. Please use past experiences to elaborate your answers. If that huge mushroom shape severely impedes penetration, you … Unlike partitioned or dual-core bullets, where the front core can separate from the bullet mass, the InterBond ® bullet holds together in a single destructive mass that delivers a deep, wide wound channel without over-penetrating. I even shot one facing me @ 40yds and the bullet exited it's rear left ham. But Nosler's Accubond has given me textbook performance. Votes: 11 31.4% Interbonds are the best. The Hornady is 162 gr and the Nosler is 160. From what I gather the I-bond is a little better on retention while the A-bond is better in penetration. Really like the round and am seeing excellent accuracy with the 210gr Nosler Partitions and 225gr Hornady SSTs, both at about 2750 over R17. Externally, they look the same except for the tip colors, Ballistic Tip® bullets are color-coded by caliber while all AccuBond® bullets have white tips. The standard AccuBond® is designed to be a highly-accurate big game hunting bullet suitable for use on a wide variety of game. Hornady are about $5/100 cheaper than the Noslers. By volume, there is more gilding metal in an InterBond than lead. The A-bond was designed to "shed its petals", if you will, and have the shank penetrate more...like a partition--in a way. gelesen. Shot was at 200 yards center just behind the shoulder blade...complete pentration dropped on the spot......load was out of Nosler Manual Max with RL 19. The accubond was built to make up for the shortcomings of the ballistic tip. The Hornady® InterBond® bullet uses a proprietary bonding process that holds the core and jacket together. .270WSM and .308Win. I have taken deer with TSXs and they worked well. The cannelure seems to do quite well holding the jacket on. That Interbond penetrated over 36" after impacting bone. I’ve shot Hornady SST, for whitetail, in my 30-06 for years and was looking for a more controlled expansion for elk. Both companies claim the jackets will not separate (Hornady n.d.) (… Bryan Litz' number is much more realistic. I prefer the Sirocco over the Nosler AB or the Hornady SST. Notice: This site is not mobile friendly, we recommend you ... Board index » Reloading » Reloading. The load is 43 grains IMR 4895 with OAL of 2.78 inches. My rifles seem to shoot the accubond more accurately. I use a 338 Win and has anyone compared the 225gr Nosler and Hornady bullets? For whatever reason, I could not get the Interbonds to shoot accurately. They are both tipped and bonded. The best hunter in our club uses Remmy core lokts. I hunt deer almost exclusively. wana bigger bike. In 2003 Nosler introduced the AccuBond. Hornady’s InterBond bullet uses a gilding metal jacket that’s formed from a sheet of copper. I shot one elk with the Accubond - broadside at about 275 yards. That is about 400 more fps that is required for the AB to expand. I've gotten really good results with A-maxs but other Hornady bullets haven't been as good as the Accubond and I really wanted a good hunting bullet. My Blaser R93 shoots the Hornady the best (6.5x55). 270 Winchester. verladen. 115 SW Columbia St | Bend, Oregon, USA 97702  |  Toll Free: Nosler Showroom / Open to the Public:  Monday - Friday 10:00 am to 5:30 pm PST, http://forums.cabelas.com/showthread.php?t=626. The Accubond is a bonded bullet that does have a significant portion of its weight derived from the jacket material, but the lead core does go all the way to the base. It's not bonded. Hornady InterBond: Known for accuracy, boat-tailed, polymer-tipped bullet is one of the softest of the bonded projectiles, making it ideal for use on all game from standard-velocity cartridges. Never pick a fight with an old man, if he is too old to fight he will just kill you! The interbonds maintain a little more weight but due to the huge frontal area penetrate a bit less. Review after review after review. The accuracy is fantastic and gives great terminal performance with deep penetration. The Hornady ® InterBond ® bullet uses a proprietary bonding process that holds the core and jacket together. I contemplated the same thing with my new 28 Nosler. and the deer ended up dead. I don't know if Hornady's number is inflated because Litz didn't test the Interbond. Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:29 pm . The Nosler Partition is the original American premium bullet and it remains a favorite of experienced hunters around the world. My beef with Nosler is their BC number for the Accubond is too high. And please feel free to elaborate. Nosler Accubond and Hornady Interbond are similar in cost and composition. They replied that a minimum of 2000 fps is required for their Intebonds in order to get decent expansion. 308 Winchester Rifle Cartridge by Nosler Inc. TECHNICAL INFORMATION: The 308 Winchester is an inherently accurate cartridge, and is at its best with medium-to … 4 Answers. Bonded means the manufacturer through their proprietary process bonds the bullet jacketing to the lead core. Which of one these are better for hunting? The range was from 40 yds to 150yds. The design of the Accubond is to mimic the performance of the Partition but with a plastic tip. The Hornady Interbond and Nosler Accubond are both bonded bullets. Lv 6. All rifles shot well under MOA(some under 1/2MOA) with accubonds. I was really impressed but I still want to try the Accubonds in my Coyote Lite in the 300WSM, the Interbonds does not shoot well in this rifle. The Hornady ® InterBond ® bullet uses a proprietary bonding process that holds the core and jacket together. Nosler Accubond vs. Hornady Interbond Accubonds are the best. I can not speak from experience with the Interbond. The Barnes TSX and others like the Hornady GMX, Nosler E-tip out penetrate the popular bonded versions. my 7x57 won't shoot interbond 139 at all but loves the interlock 139. The AccuBond Bullet (AB) - Through an exclusive bonding process that eliminates voids in the bullet core, AccuBond® couples Nosler's proven copper-alloy jacket with its special lead-alloy core. Hi there. 30 Cal .308 165 gr InterBond® Item #30459 | 100/Box . You must log in or register to reply here. I e-mailed Hornady on the subject. Unlike partitioned or dual-core bullets, where the front core can separate from the bullet mass, the InterBond ® bullet holds together in a single destructive mass that delivers a deep, wide wound channel without over-penetrating. Jetzt habe ich im Katalog eine Beschreibung der hornady Geschosse SST, Interlock usw. The aforementioned rifles would not shoot I-bonds. work well on broadside lung shot because they open up quick and make jelly of the insides. Hornady interbond vs nosler Accubond? What is the difference between the Ballistic Tip® and the AccuBond®? Out of the three I would like to use, 210gr Nosler Partition, 225gr Accubond or the 225gr Hornady Interbond out of a 338WM, I'm doing a spot and stock so shots could be varrying distance. I am still shooting plenty of Accubonds today. I had a heck of a time getting the IB to shoot in one of my 7mm's.I did find a good hunting load but it is nothing to write home about.For a bullet that looks like it is ready for a match shoot it sure wasn't a good combo for me.The bullet in question is the 154 grain Interbond. Votes: 11 ... they did not penetrate as well as the partition type bullets (Nosler/Swift). The accubond much like the Hornady interbond are tougher and designed for the bigger stuff. One VERY IMPORTANT thing to remember with the Barnes bullets and the Swift A-Frame and Sirocco bullets is that they use pure copper. The SST like the Nosler baliistic tip are designed for deer. A standard lead tip spitzer works about as well as anything else. Votes: 8 22.9% They are equally as good. This is done to overcome jacket separation at impact. They are not nearly as pricey as the similar performing partition for reloaders. Pretty much the same as Speer 130s in 277 do. I decided to go with the Nosler Trophy Grade Accubond after talking with hunters that shoot the same. I did the same thing with the Hornady Interbond. I chose Hornady because I have the utmost faith in them. Any thought on Nosler Accubond and Hornady Interbond bullets in a side by side comparison? Are they nearly the same or are they apples and oranges? SST is little more than a tipped Interlock. I have had the same experience as leoparddog. Not enough to make a big decision, but if I am buying a few hundred it does add up. I have killed many deer with them and the penetration and deposit of energy on target was phenominal. Cheers. Just re-barreled my hunting rifle to a 338-06. Page 1 of 1 [ 18 posts ] Previous topic | Next topic : Author Message; Alaska Post subject: Accubond Vs Interbond. Interbonds in my 300WSM at 3336fps. Accubond was about the tightest shooting bullet I tried out of my .270 Ackley - would shoot around 1/2" - most other loads (except the Interbond) were around 3/4". Used plenty of Hor Interlock 225s in 338 WIN & RUM. Relevance. Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests, Nosler Inc  |  Privacy  Use  Order Processing. Nosler Accubond vs. Hornady Interbond Accubonds are the best. From your experience, which is a better performing bullet, the Nosler Accubond or the Hornady Interbond? They shoot 1/2" groups out of my model 70 Winchester. We like the Nosler Accubond here, but they are quite hard to find, especially the .243 and .257 diameter. The TSX fouls your barrel with copper and lots of it. I harvested a nice 40" Moose on 10 Sep with the 225gr AB in my 338 win. JavaScript is disabled. The AB is quickly becomming more and more liked by guys that have scored with them. I shoot with a 270win & 308win. In my wet newspaper tests the Hornady Interbond holds together quite a bit better than the Nosler Accubond. Unfortunately I have not had any luck with accuracy and interbonds. I feel that they are an effective bullet while fulling recognizing that they shed their core quite frequently. Nosler's claim is that a large mushroom shape impedes penetration so the Accubond is designed to shed the nose allowing deep penetration. Last year I killed 5 deer and all of them hit the ground in their tracks with the bullets passing through leaving a hole about the size of a half dollar with very little meat damage. AccuBond® and AccuBond® Long Range share similar names and the same bonding technology, yet they are in fact two very different bullets designed for different applications. I've taken deer with both the sst and b.t. It's also heavily tapered, but not nearly to the extent of the trophy bonded. Other bullets aren't being considered at this time. Many regard the Nosler Partition as the best killing bullet ever created, and the Nosler Ballistic Tip has a stellar reputation for accuracy. By jacketed bullet standards, it is very thick, and it’s filled with a lead core. I have 13 deer and hogs at last count using Accubonds, no issues at all, they shoot well from my rifles and don't seem to be picky with regards to seating depth. Since I've never recovered one from a deer (a Nosler BT has that singular distinction for me) all I can say is they both kill deer DRT if I've done my job. SST and B.T. I can't speak for the Hornady's but with AccuBonds I have never had one run for enough to get out of sight, most are DRT! I tried the Hornady Interbond but could not get good accuracy so gave up after just using .308 caliber bullets in 30-06 and 308win. I would like to see your bullet test with the Interbond as to compare. It staggered about 35 yards and fell over dead. I save my Varget for Nosler 168 Ballistic Tips and Sierra 175 SMK bullets. May all your Pew Pews be followed by Ting Tings. The other option for starting out is the Nosler E-tip in 150 grain. The 270 Cal .277 inch diameter 130 gr InterBond® bullet from Hornady (item #27309) has a published G1 ballistic coefficient of .460, with a sectional density of .242. I tried Interbonds and Accubonds when they first came out. The bullet on the left center was recovered from ballistic gelatin at 400 yards, while the bullet on the right was recovered from gel at 50 yards. Hallo, ich möchte demnächst Nosler Accubond .338/225gr. I tend to use what groups best in my rifle. I have used the 150GR. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Has anyone compared Interbond and Accubond for weight retention? Accubond was about the tightest shooting bullet I tried out of my .270 Ackley - would shoot around 1/2" - most other loads (except the Interbond) were around 3/4". Hornady wont sell seconds outside of the town they are made in.. then i hunt witht he accubond on top.. and will have Ballistic tips as secondary rounds in the hole... works great ... the first one punches through the following BT.. just hurt all the way through. I’m debating on which ammo to try in my 28 Nosler. The SST is tougher than a Ballistic Tip. The result is a bullet that flies true, penetrates deep and retains its weight, without causing extensive Answer Save. This came at the height of the bonded bullet craze, but Nosler did not want to just offer another bonded bullet — the company had specific intent. I shot one elk with the Accubond - broadside at about 275 yards. I’ve read good and bad on Hornady brass for reloading, and Nosler brass isn’t much cheaper than … So far I tried them in 270 win(Ruger #1), 270 wsm (A-bolt and Kimber Montana) and 7mm wsm in A-bolt. I really wanted to recover a bullet but never did get the chance. I do have experience with the nosler ballistic tip and will never use them on deer size game again. Favorite Answer. I shoot Interbonds (Hornady) in my 308 and .260 and Accubonds in my 7mm-08, because that is what the guns like. 1 decade ago. Votes: 10 28.6% Neither one are worth what they cost. The bullet itself falls into the class of premium bonded hunting bullets along with the Nosler AccuBond and the Swift Scirocco. I've shot and shoot both and have killed deer with both. Nosler Reloading Forum. The I-bonds that I have seen expand and make a huge wound cavity but that does hinder penetration. ELD-X or Accubond..... back and forth! All times are UTC [ DST] Accubond Vs Interbond. Diese werden im gleichen Kaliber und im gleichen Gewicht angeboten, sind aber einiges günstiger zu haben. Both have performed very well on game. Generally speaking, I can't tell much difference in bullet performance on whitetails unless I catch a lot of bone.
Certainteed Flintlastic Sa Plybase, Shopkins Logo Font, Frackin Universe Armor, Konig Wheels 2020, Sour Zkittles Strain, Sarah Latham Video, How To Know If An Online Friend Is Real, Photoshop Background Tutorial,